I was invited back to Camberwell College of
arts today for an alumni crit with the 3rd year Drawing students, which was a
great experience, however I couldn't help but notice that my comments were somewhat
different from the other alumnus.
I was previously aware that the way I view
artwork has changed slightly, there is a different dynamic added when I
consider art. The person seems to have a higher value in my view.
Camberwell college of arts |
When critiquing the third year’s work I
felt curious about how they were feeling at the time of making for instance.
For example one student made a video piece where she used a bike, a fan and a
bucket. This immediately made me wonder about the bike… was it the students old
bike? Who did it belong to? Why was it in use? Etc.
I related a lot
of the pieces back to the personal rather the concept of the work, which is the usual direction. This forced
them to ask certain questions about their practice that they perhaps had not
before but I was very aware that my questions and thoughts were very art
therapy-esq. I don’t know how I feel about this? I found myself wondering how
the students felt when making certain laborious looking pieces, looking less at
the art in itself but more at the process of making for that individual.
Crit’s are very different in nature to the
studio discussion I’ve experienced at this University… I’m not sure if I prefer either experience but it was certainly refreshing to talk about my personal art process without having to defend certain decision making.
No comments:
Post a Comment